Christian preacher calls president a Muslim

GoLeft.tv reports

And finally, a small, touching story about open-mindedness, truth, steadfast Christian love, patriotism and love of democracy. Ok, not quite. A preacher at a church in Wichita, Kansas has put up a sign on the marquee outside his church reading: “America we have a Muslim President. This is sin against the Lord.” The sign then references Exodus Chapter 20, verse 3, the 1st commandment, “thou shalt have no other gods before me.” First and foremost, if read literally, the preacher is accusing Bush of being Muslim, and since we all know that God told Bush to run for president, that just can’t be true. The preacher says he will not remove the billboard despite the fact that Obama is a Christian. I don’t pretend to know everything about Christianity, but I do know this, God’s not a huge fan of spreading lies and hate. As a matter of fact I’m pretty sure that whole “love thy neighbor as thyself” mentioned several times in the Bible didn’t have any qualifying standards to that neighbor had to meet either. All I’m saying is that parishioners of this church just need to be careful and be made aware that maybe their fearless leader doesn’t know the Bible as well as you might think. But just to give him the benefit of the doubt, lets hear what he has to say about it…

Seems there is a lot we don’t know about ‘W’

As to the preacher, I hope he can explain himself to the Lord.

Bill Ayers’ interview with “Good Morning America”

Bill Ayers’ interview with “Good Morning America”

For a full transcript, keep on reading

First-time voters look to Obama to restore American dream

CNN reports:

An overwhelming majority of first-time voters, including the Amans, voted for Sen. Barack Obama over Sen. John McCain by a margin of 69 to 31 percent, CNN exit polls show.

After eight years of deceit, seeing how Obama approaches issues has been quite refreshening. He truely deserves the name ‘Renegade’

Is God a Liberal? Part 1

Few may be familiar with Christian Communism or Christian Socialism and yet the Bible provides us with many passages support what many have now come to see as Socialist or Communist principles. In particular Acts chapter 2 and 4

Acts 4:32-35. And the congregation of those who believed were of one heart and soul; and not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them. And with great power the apostles were giving witness to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and abundant grace was upon them all. For there was not a needy person among them, for all who were owners of land or houses would sell them and bring the proceeds of the sales and lay them at the apostles’ feet; and they would be distributed to each, as any had need.

But elsewhere in the Bible we also find other references

Deut. 15:7. If there is a poor man among you, one of your brothers, in any of the towns of the land which the LORD your God is giving you, you shall not harden your heart, nor close your hand to your poor brother; but you shall freely open your hand to him, and generously lend him sufficient for his need in whatever he lacks.

Deut. 26:12. When you have finished paying the complete tithe of your increase in the third year, the year of tithing, then you shall give it to the Levite, to the stranger, to the orphan and the widow, that they may eat in your towns, and be satisfied.

US public approves of one party control

Good news from a CNN Poll

In a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Tuesday, 59 percent of those questioned think that Democratic control of both the executive and legislative branches will be good for the country, with 38 percent saying that such one-party control will be bad

In other news

The poll also suggests that the public has a positive view of the Democratic Party, with 62 percent having a favorable opinion and 31 percent an unfavorable opinion.

That is not the case for the Republicans, with a majority, 54 percent, having an unfavorable view of the GOP and 38 percent holding a positive view.

These are good times for the United States.

America Serves

Obama has launched a new government website titled “change.gov” where he outlines his plans for encouraging young people to volunteer. Often his policies are misrepresented as requiring children to volunteer.

It feels good to be proud of our country and its leaders once again.

---

“When you choose to serve — whether it’s your nation, your community or simply your neighborhood — you are connected to that fundamental American ideal that we want life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness not just for ourselves, but for all Americans. That’s why it’s called the American dream.”

The Obama Administration will call on Americans to serve in order to meet the nation’s challenges. President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to help teachers in underserved schools, as well as a new Health Corps, Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps. Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by setting a goal that all middle school and high school students do 50 hours of community service a year and by developing a plan so that all college students who conduct 100 hours of community service receive a universal and fully refundable tax credit ensuring that the first $4,000 of their college education is completely free. Obama will encourage retiring Americans to serve by improving programs available for individuals over age 55, while at the same time promoting youth programs such as Youth Build and Head Start.

How the Press Reported the 2008 General Election

Even though Liberals and Republicans have been complaining about the unfairness of the press reporting on their candidate, recent research by the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism shows a more complex picture where the level of negativity tracked the voters’ perception of the candidates.

The conclusions are well worth repeating

What we see in these findings, above all, are two phenomena. The first is the focus on tactics and strategy. The candidate who was perceived to be winning this year got better coverage. We have seen that pattern before. In 2000, our research saw George Bush receiving more positive coverage than Gore. In 2004, our studies of a narrower time frame saw Kerry enjoying better coverage, as polls perceived his closing the gap on Bush.

The second phenomenon is an almost instantaneous reinforcing and echoing effect of the press. Presidential elections are now so heavily polled, with various daily tracks and compilations of state-by-state polls, that every campaign event is almost instantly measured for its political impact and that in turn is immediately analyzed by the political press. Each event has in a sense three echoes. The event is covered. The effect is measured. And the reaction to that measurement by the campaigns is then examined and covered.

That pattern becomes a snowball, and the trajectory of any one campaign event is magnified.

Occasionally the news media will alter this dynamic pattern of covering the candidates’ behavior and then measuring the political effect of it—with their own enterprise or background pieces. This year, stories about Palin’s record or Obama’s relationship with a former terrorist are examples. These may in turn influence the behavior of the candidates. But these enterprise stories represent a fairly limited portion of the coverage. And that enterprise may be diminishing as the press suffers cutbacks in resources. To that extent, the agenda-setting influence of the media may be diminishing.

Even more occasionally the press will influence the narrative by asking questions of the candidates directly. This, however, is rare in presidential general election periods, when candidates severely limit their exposure to the traveling press corps for direct inquiries. There is relatively little of that in this sample, save for the Palin interviews.

The story of the media coverage of the general election phase of this race, at least so far, is the snowball effect on John McCain. In the press, this race became substantially defined around the troubles that began for McCain in mid-September and the difficulties he had in trying to change the trajectory of the race in the weeks that followed. With a press corps heavily focused on horse race, and a candidate whose strategy was apparently thrown off by events, he has been unable to change that narrative.

Olbermann: Gay marriage is a question of love

Keith Olbermann writes

Quote me anything from your religious leader or book of choice telling you to stand against this. And then tell me how you can believe both that statement and another statement, another one which reads only “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

When a hack bases his show around a hack

Olbermann on Hannity

Obama Family’s Secret Service names

In other secret service news:

The Obama family recently received its new (and alliterative) names: “Renegade” (Barack), “Renaissance” (Michelle), “Radiance” (Malia) and “Rosebud” (Sasha).